Car Detail Guys

Automotive News From Around the World
Menu
  • best car polish
  • best car wax
  • best scratch remover
  • car detailing
  • car detailing products
  • car scratch remover
  • News
  • Reviews
  • scratch doctor
  • swirl marks on car
  • Technology
  • Top Stories
  • Uncategorized

Ford pays $19 million to settle claims on fuel economy, payload

Jeff Lincoln May 25, 2022

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Ford Motor Business on Tuesday settled claims by 40 U.S. point out lawyers normal that the organization produced deceptive statements about the gasoline overall economy and payload potential of some of its cars, violating state client security legislation.

The enterprise agreed to shell out $19.2 million to the states and refrain from producing deceptive promoting promises as section of the settlement submitted in San Diego Remarkable Courtroom in California.

The lawyers common explained Ford misled people about its 2013-2014 C-Max hybrid vehicles and 2011-2014 Super Duty pickup trucks.

The company misrepresented how much the C-Max hybrids could travel on a tank of fuel and that the automobiles had greater genuine-earth fuel economic climate than other hybrids, the legal professional generals claimed.

Volkswagen eyes two new North American plants
Volkswagen eyes two new North American plantsRead more

They said Ford also deliberately remaining out of its payload calculations for Super Responsibility pickup vehicles standard merchandise that included the spare wheel, tire, jack and motor vehicle radio, so artificially raising the claimed payload potential.

Ford said in a statement that it was delighted the investigation was settled with no judicial acquiring of incorrect conduct and that the corporation denied violating any federal or state rules.

“We worked with the states to solve their considerations and in the course of action confined added investigative expenditures and lawful fees for all parties,” the company stated.

Ford stated it voluntarily flagged the incorrect fuel financial state score for federal regulators, corrected it and reimbursed people who acquired or leased the autos for the duration of and shortly just after the time that the score was incorrectly marketed.

Potential buyers “should be able to trust that they’re receiving what they compensated for,” California Lawyer General Rob Bonta stated in saying the settlement.

The $1.2 million for California from the settlement will support state and regional enforcement of buyer security legal guidelines.

The settlement includes Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Ga, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Prev Article
Next Article

Related Articles

Best Anchor Ropes (Review) in 2022 – Autoblog Commerce
Autoblog is not affiliated with the models showcased in our …

Best Anchor Ropes (Review) in 2022 – Autoblog Commerce

Tesla faces new race bias trial from employee who had $137 million verdict slashed
A demo kicks off in San Francisco federal court on …

Tesla faces new race bias trial from employee who had $137 million verdict slashed

About The Author

Jeff Lincoln

Recent Posts

  • Best Looking Midsize Suv
  • Total Electric Cars
  • Best Midrange Suv
  • Best Looking Pick Up Trucks
  • Car And Driver Evs

Car Detail Guys

Automotive News From Around the World
Copyright © 2023 Car Detail Guys
Theme by Fashion Lift Tape

Ad Blocker Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Refresh
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}